Risk-Based Integration of Fault Mitigation Into Spatial Planning Land Dynamics and Settlement Vulnerability in Tanah Datar

Authors

  • Annisa Risk-Based Integration of Fault Mitigation Into Spatial Planning Land Dynamics and Settlement Vulnerability in Tanah Datar
  • Safiah Yusmah Binti Muhammad Yusoff Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
  • Febriandi Master Program of Geography Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Ratna Wilis Master Program of Geography Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/sjdgge.v10i1.702

Keywords:

Disaster Mitigation, Active Faults, , Earthquakes, Spatial Plans

Abstract

Tanah Datar Regency is highly vulnerable to earthquake hazards due to the Semangko fault and its two active segments, Sumani and Sianok, which induce significant tectonic deformation and directly affect settlements and land-use dynamics. This study was conducted to fill the knowledge gap related to the integration of disaster mitigation in spatial planning, with two main objectives: 1) identifying and analyzing spatial conflicts that arise between the dynamics of land use change, the distribution of vulnerable settlements, and active fault disaster prone zones with the regional spatial planning of Tanah Datar Regency; and 2) formulating a model for integrating fault disaster mitigation into spatial planning based on risk analysis as a recommendation for sustainable spatial planning policies. The approach used is a mixed method with sequential explanatory variables. Quantitative analysis was conducted through spatial mapping to assess hazard levels, physical vulnerability, and the dynamics of land-use change, while qualitative analysis was used to validate the model and policy through regulatory interpretation and stakeholder interviews. The results show that 7.59% of Tanah Datar is in a high earthquake-hazard zone, followed by moderate (15.9%) and low (1.45%) hazards. Population distribution also shows that the majority of the population (20,094) lives in areas with a high level of impact, while 58,230 people are in the medium category and 67,87 people in the low category. This finding confirms the mismatch between settlement Development, land conversion dynamics, and the risk zoning applicable in the spatial plans. Therefore, the integration of disaster mitigation can no longer be positioned as an additional compent, but must become the primary foundation in spatial planning. This study recommends an integration model that places disaster risk maps as the primary reference in the formulation of spatial policies, thereby guiding the establishment of protected zones, settlements, and economic centers more safely and sustainably. This guide is expected to strengthen regional resilience and provide a scientific basis for the Development of evidence-based spatial planning policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]M. Sarkowi, R. C. Wibowo, And I. B. S. Yogi, “Potensi Gempabumi Di Sepanjang Sesar Semangko Segmen Lampung,” Vol. 03, No. 01.

[2]A. Kurniawan Et Al., “Analisis Seismisitas Dan Mekanisme Fokus Sesar Sumatera: Studi Kasus Segmen Semangko Dan Selat Sunda,” J. Teknol. Dan Inov. Ind. Jtii, Vol. 5, No. 2, Oct. 2024, Doi: 10.23960/Jtii.V5i2.98.

[3]S. Erfani And I. R. Sari, “Analisis Model Struktur Bawah Permukaan Berdasarkan Tomografi Seismik Wilayah Sumatera Barat Menggunakan Lotos12,” Wahana Fis., Vol. 6, No. 1, Pp. 59–70, June 2021, Doi: 10.17509/Wafi.V6i1.34036.

[4]O. Niroha, A. Putra, And A. F. Pohan, “Pemodelan Struktur Bawah Permukaan Menggunakan Metode Seismik Refraksi Pada Prospek Panas Bumi Nagari Aie Angek, Kabupaten Tanah Datar,” J. Fis. Unand, Vol. 10, No. 4, Pp. 525–531, Nov. 2021, Doi: 10.25077/Jfu.10.4.52

[5]P. N. Sari, “Identifikasi Kesiapsiagaan Masyarakat Terhadap Bencana Gempa Bumi Di Segmen Sianok Pada Zona Patahan Semangko (The Sumatran Fault Zone) Kabupaten Agam,” Vol. 3, No. 2.

“[No Title Found],” J. Nat. Resour. Environ. Manag

[6]Y. Dewi And D. Chandra, “Analisis Perkembangan Dan Kesesuaian Lahan Permukiman Terhadap Rtrw Kota Padang Panjang,” Vol. 10, 2025.

[7]W. Winarti, T. F. Fathani, And D. Legono, “Disaster Risk Analysis To Support The Development Of Regional Spatial Plan Of Tasikmalaya Regency, Indonesia,” J. Civ. Eng. Forum, Vol. 4, No. 2, P. 167, May 2018

[8]S. Wahyu Et Al., “Flood Hazard Risk Assessment Based On Multi-Criteria Spatial Analysis Gis As Input For Spatial Planning Policies In Tegal Regency, Indonesia,” Geogr. Pannonica, Vol. 27, No. 1, Pp. 50–68 “Isprs-Archives-Xlviii-5-W3-2025-137-2025.”

[9]R. Singh, “The Role Of Geographic Information Systems (Gis) In Disaster Management And Planning,” Int. J. Geogr. Geol. Environ., Vol. 6, No. 2, Pp. 195–205, July 2024, Doi: 10.22271/27067483.2024.V6.I2c.

[10]A. Gunawan And P. Khadiyanto, “Kajian Aspek Bentuk Lahan Dan Geologi Berdasarkan Mikrotremor Dalam Perencanaan Ruang Kawasan Rawan Gempa Di Kabupaten Bantul Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Bantul, Jetis, Imogiri, Dan Kretek),” J. Pembang. Wil. Kota, Vol. 8, No. 2, P. 178, June 2012, Doi: 10.14710/Pwk.V8i2.1157

[11]E. A. Giofandi, B. A. R. Bunga, B. Barus, And W. Iskandar, “Community Vulnerability Assessment Against Landslide Hazard Potential In Tanah Datar Regency, Indonesia,” Vol. 03, No. 01, 2024.

[12]N. Saputra, “Desain Penelitian Mixed Methodesain Penelitian Mixed Method”.

[13]I. Dewata, “Dynamic Model Of Land Use Change In Landslide Hazard Zones In Tanah Datar District, West Sumatra,” Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019.

[14]M. F. Yassar Et Al., “Penerapan Weighted Overlay Pada Pemetaan Tingkat Probabilitas Zona Rawan Longsor Di Kabupaten Sumedang, Jawa Barat,” J. Geosains Dan Remote Sens., Vol. 1, No. 1, Pp. 1–10, May 2020, Doi: 10.23960/Jgrs.2020.

[15]I. Sugiyarto, R. Irawan, And D. Rosiyadi, “Pengelompokan Dampak Gempa Bumi Dan Kerusakan Pada Wilayah Berpotensi Gempa Di Provinsi Sumatera Barat”.

[16]F. Fauzan And N. Widya, “Pengaruh Topografi Terhadap Divergensi Fenotip Katak Fejervaria Canrivora Di Kabupaten Tanah Datar,” Menara Ilmu, Vol. 16, No. 1, Jan. 2022, Doi: 10.31869/Mi.V16i1.3108.

[17]A. Y. Daud, S. Syafri, And B. Jaya, “Analisis Mitigasi Bencana Tanah Longsor Di Kecamatan Kalukku Kabupaten Mamuju,” Urban Reg. Stud. J., Vol. 7, No. 2, Pp. 190–203, June 2025, Doi: 10.35965/Ursj.V7i2.6043.

[18]Maulana Jordan Al Fadhi, Billy Septrianda Putra, Reka Khorisma, Wulandari, And Edra Satmaidi, “Mitigasi Bencana Dalam Kebijakan Penataan Ruang Pasca Uu Cipta Kerja Dan Pp No. 21 Tahun 2021,” J. Ilm. Kutei, Vol. 24, No. 1, Pp. 56–68, July 2025, Doi: 10.33369/Jik.V24i1.42400.

[19]M. R. Fairuzzen, V. H. Merpaung, A. A. Putra, A. A. Malik, And D. Mahipal, “Peran Tata Ruang Dalam Mitigasi Risiko Pembangunan Dan Pencegahan Bencana Alam”.

[20]Y. Pramudika And I. P. Putra, “Kajian Kebijakan Tata Ruang Pasca Bencana: Studi Di Desa Tompe, Donggala, Sulawesi Tengah,” Vol. 23, 2024.

[21]G. Tocchi, G. Cremen, C. Galasso, And M. Polese, “Integrating Multi-Hazard, Socio-Physical Information In A Holistic Index For Decision Making On Disaster Risk Reduction,” July 30, 2024, In Review. Doi: 10.21203/Rs.3.Rs-4660021/V1.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25