Gender-Based Sustainable Disaster Response Education to Anticipate the Problem of Women’s Vulnerability

  • Yudi Hartono Universitas PGRI Madiun
Keywords: Gender-Based Education, Disaster Response, Woman Vulnerability

Abstract

This study revealed the condition of women during a disaster in Indonesia, roles, rights and their fulfilment, and anticipates the problem of women's vulnerability in disasters. The method used was a literature study. Sources of data were from books, journals, research reports, mass media and other relevant literature sources. Data validation was done using source triangulation. The data was analyzed using interactive analysis. The results show that the condition of women during a disaster in Indonesia was faced with various vulnerabilities which resulted in a large percentage of the number of victims. However, in of such vulnerabilities, women could act as a driving force for their families and their environment to take disaster risk reduction actions. Women struggled to maintain the survival of their families and society, although, on the other hand, their rights tended to be neglected due to gender-biased socio-cultural constructions. The rights of women could not be properly guaranteed and it became even more difficult during a disaster. Women's vulnerability can be anticipated with gender-based sustainable disaster responses education that involves men and women with attention to women's rights during a disaster through formal and non-formal education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] UNDP. Making Aceh Safer through Disaster Risk Reduction in Development. United Nations Development Programme and Government of Indonesia, 2012.
[2] Kemenkumham, Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 tahun 2007 Tentang Penanggulangan Bencana. Jakarta: Kemenhukham, 2007.
[3] Dharmodjo S. Proses Bermukim Masyarakat Marjinal Pasca Bencana Gempa Dan Tsunami Di Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam – Indonesia: Studi Kasus Masyarakat Marjinal di Sekitar Pelabuhan Malahayati, Aceh Besar. Seminar Internasional Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya, 17-18 Nopember 2005.
[4] Enarson E. Women Building their Future: Gender Breakthroughs in Post-Tsunami Aceh. UNIFEM, 2009.
[5] UNIFEM. Women’s Voices in Aceh Reconstruction: The Second All-Acehnese Women’s Congress. UNIFEM, 2006.
[6] Oxfam. The Tsunami’s Impact on Women. Oxfam Briefing Note, March 2005.
[7] Oxfam. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction,2009.
[8] Huberman M.B., Miles A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Method. Sage Publication, 2014.
[9] Haryono T.J.S., Koesbardiati T., Kinasih E. Model Strategi Mitigasi Berbasis Kepentingan Perempuan pada Komunitas Survivor di Wilayah Rawan Banjir. Departemen Antropologi, FISIP, Universitas Airlangga Surabaya, 2008.
[10] Waryono, Noorkamilah and Gazali H. Resilience Perempuan dalam Bencana Alam Merapi: Studi di Kinahrejo Umbulharjo Cangkringan Sleman Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sossial, 1(1), 2012, http://digilib.uinsuka.ac.id/13929.
[11] Fordham M. The Place of Gender in Earthquake Vulnerability and Mitigation. Anglia Polytechnic University: Disaster Studies Project, 2000.
[12] Fatimah D., and Agustin R. Perempuan dan Kerelawanan dalam Bencana: Studi Kasus Penanganan Bencana di Kabupaten Bantul, DIY. Yogyakarta: Perhimpunan Aksara, 2007.
[13] Sukarni R., Krisnatuti D., and Herawati T. Dukungan Sosial dan Fungsi Keluarga Pascagempa di Wilayah Pegunungan dan Pesisir Kabupaten Lombok Timur. SOSIO KONSEPSIA, 8(03), 2019, pp. 303–320, https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v8i3.1783.
[14] Hartono Y.. Laporan Akhir Respon Bencana Tsunami Bidang Community Organizer YEU Area Meulaboh Aceh Barat. Yogyakarta: Yakkum Emergency Unit, 2006.
[15] Hartono Y. Laporan Akhir Respon Bencana Tsunami Pangandaran Bidang Community Organizer. Yogyakarta: Yakkum Emergency Unit, 2008.
[16] Krisna A. Peranan relawan Perempuan sebagai Agen Perubahan Dalam Masyarakat Pada Upaya Pengurangan Resiko Bencana di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Perempuan-Perempuan Relawan yang Bekerja Pada Organisasi Pengurangan Resiko Bencana. Laporan Hasil Penelitian: FPIPS UPI Bandung, 2008.
[17] Bertens K. Sejarah Filsafat Yunani. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1994.
[18] Noer D. Pemikiran Politik di Negeri Barat. Jakarta: Mizan, 1996.
[19] Humrn M. The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. England: Prentice-Hall, 1999.
[20] Asshiddiqie J. Hak konstitusional Perempuan dan Tantangan Penegakannya. Dialog Publik dan Konsultasi Nasional Komnas Perempuan, “Perempuan dan Konstitusi di Era Otonomi Daerah: Tantangan dan Penyikapan Bersama. Jakarta, 27 Nopember 2007..
[21] Yuliani S. Difference gender on mastery of language reviewed from psychology learning perspective. Pedagogia: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidik, 13(1), 2013, pp. 47–51.
[22] Murtakhamah T. Pengalaman Perempuan dan Inisiasi Pusat Krisis Berbasis Komunitas untuk Pengurangan Resiko Bencana. Konferensi Nasional Pengurangan Resiko Bencana Berbasis Komunitas VII, Yogyakarta tanggal 5 – 8 Desember 2011.
[23] S. Khatoon S, et.al. Blogging in ESL class- gender-based attitude of the engineering students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 2020, pp. 1128–1137, 10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20673.
[24] Martin L.M. Boards of directors and gender diversity in UK companies. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23(3), 2008, pp. 194–208, 10.1108/17542410810866944.
[25] Dirilen-gumus O., and Buyuksahin-sunal A. Gender differences in Turkish undergraduate students’ values. Sex Roles, 67, 2021, pp. 559–570, 10.1007/s11199-012-0197-4.
[26] Ericsson T. Women, family, and small business in late nineteenth-century Sweden. History of Family, 6(2), 2001, pp. 225–239, 10.1016/S1081-602X(01)00068-9.
[27] Warrren K. Ecological Feminist Philosophies: An Overview of the Issues in Karen J. (Ed). Ecological Feminist Philosophies. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1996.
[28] Harper E. Guardianship, Inheritance and Land Law in Post-Tsunami Aceh. International Development Law Organization, 2007.
[29] Ikeda S., and Nagasaka T. An emergent framework of disaster risk governance towards innovating coping capability for reducing disaster risks in local communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2(2), 2011, 10.1007/s13753-011-0006-7.
[30] Atmojo S.E., et.al., “The reconstruction of disaster knowledge through thematic learning of science, environment, technology, and society integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 2018, pp. 204–213, 10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14273.
[31] Darysyani D. Problem Posing Learning Model For Developing Students’ Natural Disaster Responsiveness Characters in Indonesia (A Case Study in State Senior High Schools in Kerinci). Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education, 1(2), 2017, pp. 307–314, https://doi.org/10.24036/sjdgge.v1i2.65.
[32] Syahputra H.. Indigenous knowledge representation in mitigation process: A study of communities’ understandings of natural disasters in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Collection and Curation, 38(4), 2019, pp. 94–102, 10.1108/CC-11-2017-0046.
[33] Widodo E., and Hastuti. Local Wisdom in Responding to Disaster of Merapi Eruption: Case Study of Wonolelo Village. GEOSFERA Indonesia, 4(3), 2019, pp. 264–279, 10.19184/geosi.v4i3.14066.
Published
2021-06-25
Abstract viewed = 309 times
PDF downloaded = 220 times