Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment in Sanma Island, Republic of Vanuatu

  • Jafar Jafar Universitas Islam Indonesia
Keywords: Earthquake, Vulnerability Assessment, AHP, Vanuatu

Abstract

The purpose of this assessment is to identify which councils on Sanma Island are vulnerable to earthquake hazards. To measure vulnerability, it is necessary to identify certain contributing components, including exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Exposure and sensitivity contribute to increasing the vulnerability, while adaptive capacity contributes to decreasing the vulnerability. Using this scheme, we identify specific variables for each component. These variables are called vulnerability variables. Next, we employ the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to obtain scores for each variable. Following the vulnerability assessment, five councils are categorized as areas with high vulnerability scores, including Canal-Fanafo, East Malo, East Santo, West Malo, and West Santo. This is because these areas are relatively close to the source of the threat (earthquake hazard). Moreover, these councils have a limited number of public facilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. L. Peek and D. S. Mileti, “The History and Future of Disaster Research,” in Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 2002, pp. 511–524.
[2] UNISDR, “Hazard,” 2007. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/hazard (accessed Jul. 11, 2023).
[3] A. Wirtz and R. Below, “Disaster Category Classification and peril Terminology for Operational Purposes,” Context, no. October, pp. 1–20, 2009, [Online]. Available: cred.be/sites/default/files/DisCatClass_264.pdf.
[4] Widodo, Seismologi Teknik dan Rekayasa Kegempaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
[5] T. Islam and J. Ryan, “Chapter 5 - Hazard Identification—Natural Hazards,” T. Islam and J. B. T.-H. M. in E. M. Ryan, Eds. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016, pp. 129–170.
[6] Y. Du, Y. Ding, Z. Li, and G. Cao, “The role of hazard vulnerability assessments in disaster preparedness and prevention in China,” Mil. Med. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 27, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s40779-015-0059-9.
[7] P. Bountzis, G. Tsaklidis, and E. Papadimitriou, “Pseudo-prospective forecasting of large earthquakes full distribution in circum-Pacific belt incorporating non-stationary modeling,” Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl., vol. 604, p. 127945, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127945.
[8] UNISDR, “Exposure,” 2009. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/exposure (accessed Jul. 11, 2023).
[9] J. Douglas, “Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates,” Earth-Science Rev., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 43–104, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00112-5.
[10] USGS, “ANSS Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog.” https://earthquake.usgs.gov/data/comcat/index.php#2.
[11] Vanuatu National Statistics Office, “2016 Post - TC PAM Mini Census Report. Port Vila,” 2017. .
[12] H.-M. Füssel and R. J. T. Klein, “Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking,” Clim. Change, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 301–329, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3.
[13] J. Taylor, D. Fatimah, S. Dougherty, R. Hidayani, and A. Rifai, Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Kupang City. Solo: United Nations Development Programme- Safer Communities Through Risk Reduction (UNDP-SCDRR) and Yayasan Kota Kita. 2015.
Published
2024-01-02
Abstract viewed = 170 times
PDF downloaded = 111 times