Analysis of the Attractiveness and Satisfaction of Visitors to Kasang Kulim Zoo After the Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Yanur Merny Siak Regency Education Office – Senior High School 2 Minas, Indonesia
  • Genius Umar Expert Staff to the Regional Representative Council (DPD RI), Indonesia
  • Hendri Head of the Padang Pariaman Regency Education Office
  • Rosdianto Agricultural College (STIPER) Kutai Timur, Indonesia
  • Osronita Department of Geography, Universitas Taman Siswa, Indonesia
  • Linda Handayuni STIKES Dharma Landbouw Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/sjdgge.v10i1.729

Keywords:

tourist attractions, visitor satisfaction, Kasang Kulim zoo

Abstract

Tourism is a strategic sector that contributes significantly to economic growth and regional development, but the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on tourism activities, including educational and conservation-based tourist destinations. This study aims to analyze the tourist attraction and visitor satisfaction at Kasang Kulim Zoo (KKZ), Kampar Regency, Riau Province, in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The results show that the appeal of KKZ is shaped by the diversity of its animal collection, educational and conservation values, natural environment, and family tourism experiences. Post-pandemic visitor satisfaction is influenced by the quality of facilities, cleanliness, comfort, safety, and the alignment between expectations and tourism experiences. Although visitor numbers show a recovery trend, challenges remain in terms of accessibility and facility management. Additionally, the presence of KKZ has a positive impact on the economic recovery of local MSMEs, making sustainable tourism management key to post-pandemic destination development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bramwell B, Lane B. Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2011;19(4–5):411–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.580586

Scott D, Hall CM, Gössling S. Global tourism vulnerability to climate change. Annals of Tourism Research. 2019;77:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.05.007

Ballantyne R, Packer J, Sutherland LA. Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism. Tourism Management. 2011;32(4):770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.004

Gössling S, Scott D, Hall CM. Pandemics, tourism and global change. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2020;29(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708

Ashley C, Mitchell J. Tourism and poverty reduction. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2009;17(2):193–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495714

Prayag G, Ryan C. Antecedents of tourists’ loyalty. Journal of Travel Research. 2012;51(3):342–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287511410320

Pine BJ, Gilmore JH. The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1999.

Oh H, Fiore AM, Jeoung M. Measuring experience economy concepts: Tourism applications. Journal of Travel Research. 2007;46(2):119–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287507304039

OECD. Tourism Policy Responses to the Coronavirus (COVID-19). Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020.

UNWTO. Tourism and COVID-19: Economic Impacts. Madrid: World Tourism Organization; 2021.

Hall CM, Scott D, Gössling S. Pandemics, transformations and tourism. Tourism Geographies. 2021;22(3):577–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1759131

Sigala M. Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications. Journal of Business Research. 2020;117:312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.015

Pine BJ, Gilmore JH. The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1999.

Higgins-Desbiolles F. Socialising tourism for social and ecological justice after COVID-19. Tourism Geographies. 2020;22(3):610–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1757748

Halden D, Jones P, Wixey S. Measuring accessibility as experienced by different socially disadvantaged groups. Transport Policy. 2005;12(4):319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.03.002

Oliver RL. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.

Chi CGQ, Qu H. Destination image, satisfaction and loyalty. Tourism Management. 2008;29(4):624–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.06.007

Chen CF, Chen FS. Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioural intentions. Tourism Management. 2010;31(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.008

Anwar S. Visitor experience and satisfaction in zoological tourism destinations. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change. 2022;20(3):412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2021.1895603

Geurs KT, Van Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies. Journal of Transport Geography. 2004;12(2):127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005

Frost W. Zoo tourism: Biodiversity, conservation and value. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2011;19(4–5):557–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.561216

Falk JH, Dierking LD. The Museum Experience Revisited. London: Routledge; 2013.

Ballantyne R, Packer J. Visitors’ perceptions of conservation education in zoos. Tourism Management. 2016;53:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.006

Neuburger L, Egger R. Travel risk perception and behaviour during COVID-19. Tourism Review. 2021;76(1):180–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-07-2020-0343

Bae SY, Chang PJ. COVID-19 risk perception and behavioural intention for untact tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives. 2021;38:100813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100813

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30